{"id":730,"date":"2018-01-12T11:33:14","date_gmt":"2018-01-12T10:33:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/?page_id=730"},"modified":"2018-05-25T09:53:27","modified_gmt":"2018-05-25T07:53:27","slug":"legal-successes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/legal-successes\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal successes"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>\n\t\t\t\tLegal Milestones<br \/>\n\t\t\t<\/h1>\n<h4>These issues have been legally resolved \/ clarified, thanks to us:<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The requirements under which special payments by labor law of any kind are to be corrected as \u201cNeumasseverbindlichkeiten\u201d according to German law \u00a7209 paragraph 1 No. 2, paragraph 2 No. 3 InsO, through Supreme Court ruling on March 23<sup>rd<\/sup>, 2017, file number 6 AZR 264\/16-, ZIP 2017 = ZInsO 2017, 1281<\/li>\n<li>The enforcement ban under insolvency law after notice of deficiency does not hinder the examination of\u00a0 pension insurance institute in determining missing social security payments against the liquidator through payment notices in full amount, despite the regulation of \u00a7335 paragraph 3 clause 2 SGB III (Federal Social Court, ruling on May 28<sup>th<\/sup>, 2015, file B 12 R 16\/13 R-, ZIP 2016, 128 = NZI 2016, 2583)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of liability of the liquidator for salary claims by the non-working employees after notice of deficiency (Higher Regional Court D\u00fcsseldorf, ruling on January 27<sup>th<\/sup>, 2012, file I-22 U 49\/11 -, ZIP 2012, 2115)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of consideration of support obligations for children as part of the social selection solely because they are listed on the income tax card (Federal Labor Court, ruling on June 28<sup>th<\/sup>, 2012, file 6 AZR 682\/10 -, BAGE 142, 225 = ZIP 2012, 1927 = NZA 2012, 1090)<\/li>\n<li>The requirements under which a debtor is to be granted monetary aid for legal fees by administrative order of the \u201cweak\u201d temporary liquidators (Federal Labor Court, August 3<sup>rd<\/sup>, 2011, file 3 AZB 8\/11-, ZInsO 2012, 1043 = NZA 2011, 1243)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of liability of the managing associate of an insolvent company for HR development and qualification because of material undercapitalization (Supreme Court, April 28<sup>th<\/sup>, 2008, file II ZR 264\/06-, BGHZ 176, 204 = ZIP 2008 1232 = ZInsO 2008, 758 \u2013 \u201cGAMMA\u201d)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of original responsibility of the group works council in case of standardization of an employer financed company pension inside the corporate group (Federal Labor Court, January 24<sup>th<\/sup>, 2006, file 3 AZR 483\/04 -, NZA-RR 2007, 595)<\/li>\n<li>If the liquidator keeps using the rental object after the opening of the insolvency case without demanding contractual performance, the claim by the landlord for compensation for use does represent bankruptcy expenses (Supreme Court, March 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 2007, file IX ZR 81\/05-, ZIP 2007.778 = NZI 2007, 1594)<\/li>\n<li>If the bankruptcy court enacts a reservation of approval according to \u00a7 21 paragraph 2 No. 2 alternative 2 InsO, employment contracts of the debtor can only be terminated with approval of the temporary liquidator (Federal Labor Court, October 10<sup>th<\/sup>, 2002, file 2 AZR 532\/01-, ZIP 2003, 1161 = ZInsO 2003, 817)<\/li>\n<li>The legitimacy of job creation companies as part of an employment and qualification model (Federal Labor Court, December 10<sup>th<\/sup>, 1998, and January 21<sup>st<\/sup>, 1999, files ZIP 1999, 320 and following; ZIP 1999, 1572 and following)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of ending of a refund claim on restoration of the capital stock according to \u00a7 31 paragraph 1 GmbHG (\u201cProcedo judgments\u201d, Supreme Court, May 29<sup>th<\/sup>, 2000, files II ZR 75\/98 [not published yet]; II ZR 118\/98, NZI 2000, 417 and following = ZInsO 2000, 453 and following = ZIP 2000, 1251 and following; II ZR 347 97, ZIP 2000, 1256 and following)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of the legitimacy of \u201cKaug\u201d prefinancing (Federal Social Court, March 23<sup>rd<\/sup>, 1995, file ZIP 1995, 935 and following)<\/li>\n<li>The issue of the applicability of capital replacement rules for stock companies (Supreme Court, March 26<sup>th<\/sup>, 1984, file ZIP 1984, 572 and following)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Milestones These issues have been legally resolved \/ clarified, thanks to us: The requirements under which special payments by labor law of any kind are to be corrected as \u201cNeumasseverbindlichkeiten\u201d according to German law \u00a7209 paragraph 1 No. 2, paragraph 2 No. 3 InsO, through Supreme Court ruling on March 23rd, 2017, file number&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/730"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=730"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1044,"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/730\/revisions\/1044"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vdf.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}